Thursday, March 12, 2009
Crimes Against Humanity
The idea of the President of Sudan being issued a warrant for arrest did not at first strike me with particular intrigue. I mistakenly assumed that it was just another corrupt politician. However, in reading further into the articles, that the news sites have posted, I realized that the situation was definitely a great deal more complex. The International Criminal Court is charging President Omar Al Bashir on 5 counts of crimes against humanity. This, in itself, is amazing to me in that the idea of a President being charged with anything that involves the safety of people seems extremely hypocritical. That a president would issue orders of "murder...extermination...forcible transfer...torture...and rape" (ICC), does not make immediate sense to me. I found in the interview in the pod casts from the "Voices of Genocide Prevention", that Judge Gabrielle Kirk McDonald stated quite clearly that " its important toward international criminal...that no one will be excused". In this way, I believe President Bashir will be used as an example as to what can happen to corrupt individuals. She says that even heads of states can be indicted. In this case, I have found the video testimony on the New York Times website to be efficient and important. In reading the text, Lindsey Hilsum of Channel 4 News in Britain writes in her blog that, "He had no presence, no charisma, no charm, no magnetism". I believe, in this way, that the video testimony becomes an important part of the trials. In a case such as this one, you are basically judging this man based on his character. In showing his demeanor, I was really able to get a better idea of what type of man this was, which I think will be important in conducting the trials.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment