The reason I have chosen these two testimonies is because I wanted to get a man and a woman’s prospectives on their experiences within the concentration camp. Also, in class we touched on the ideology of memory, and how it changes throughout time. I also analyzed how both of the stories clarity, and accuracy of each story.
Throughout Bella’s testimony she touches the constant hardship of her various tasks throughout the concentration camp. Nonetheless, I believe Bella mainly focused on her “working experience.” She went into concise detail on how showed worked fourteen hours, and was then sent to the next job. Bella did speak about her family, but it was not the main focus. On the other hand, George Gottlieb explains a particular event in his experience within the concentration camp. George’s testimony was very detailed, and spoken with such passion and emotion compared to Bella’s experience. Throughout Bella’s testimony I had noticed that the interviewer (Boder) seem as if he were asking the questions in a forceful way. While in George Gottlieb’s testimony seem not to be as much of a structured testimony. Overall, both testimonies share the pain and anguish of the holocaust. What I find interesting is that both George and Bella are now viewed as “survivors” of the same struggle. Both survivors have place themselves in history.
No comments:
Post a Comment